|
Post by RIP OLDS on May 14, 2016 17:56:24 GMT -5
So I was at a large car show today. Among the many that stopped by to check out my 442 was an older gentleman. He asked if I had the original 425 in the car. I told him these cars came with a 400, not a 425. He then said they also came with a 425, as the one he factory ordered in 1965 and owned for about 5 years had a 425 in it. He wasn't a knucklehead, seemed to know everything about these cars. He said his friend also had one, but had the 400 in it.
|
|
|
Post by BR[] on May 15, 2016 6:12:23 GMT -5
The 400 was a "destroked" 425. That's all i'm sayin'
|
|
|
Post by joepadavano on May 15, 2016 9:56:44 GMT -5
The 400 was a "destroked" 425. That's all i'm sayin' "Destroked" Kinda hard to do when they both used the same crank (and thus had the same stroke)... The 400 DID have a smaller bore than the 425, however, 4.000" vs. 4.125". As for the 425 in the 442 rumor that won't die, no one who claims this is true has yet produced a scrap of factory documentation or other proof.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 15, 2016 11:20:25 GMT -5
I first read BR[]`s post shortly after it was posted. I read right thru it, understanding what was meant by "destroked" We normally think of stroking an engine to increase or decrease engine rpm`s. If I were to be in a discussion with people I know and told them I was going to destroke an engine by doing nothing more than decreasing bore size, no one would raise an eyebrow !! They`d probably roll there eyes because it`s quite a little work to decrease bore size in an existing engine. Destroking is immediately associated with increasing engine rpm`s, reducing the weight of the rotating mass is immediately associated with increasing rpm`s. By decreasing the piston mass you are in effect destroking. The nice part is, GM decreased the bore size in the 400, thereby destroking a 425 allowing a faster turning engine.
It`s all terminology is all
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 15, 2016 11:25:17 GMT -5
I hope the 425 rumor never dies, and lots of things went on in the 60`s cars that can`t be documented. I`d have to erase a lot of memories working on these cars back then if the only things that could be worked on had to be on the build sheet. Cookie cutter they weren't !!!
|
|
|
Post by joepadavano on May 15, 2016 17:09:39 GMT -5
I first read BR[]`s post shortly after it was posted. I read right thru it, understanding what was meant by "destroked" We normally think of stroking an engine to increase or decrease engine rpm`s. If I were to be in a discussion with people I know and told them I was going to destroke an engine by doing nothing more than decreasing bore size, no one would raise an eyebrow !! They`d probably roll there eyes because it`s quite a little work to decrease bore size in an existing engine. Destroking is immediately associated with increasing engine rpm`s, reducing the weight of the rotating mass is immediately associated with increasing rpm`s. By decreasing the piston mass you are in effect destroking. The nice part is, GM decreased the bore size in the 400, thereby destroking a 425 allowing a faster turning engine. It`s all terminology is all Destroke means to reduce the STROKE of the motor, period. Usually this is done to increase RPM potential. Sometimes it is done to fit into a specific racing class. Note that one can destroke a motor and NOT reduce the displacement. The fact that people play fast and loose with terminology doesn't make it correct (see: "numbers matching" for example). Language is the use of common terms to represent ideas. If you choose a different meaning, you aren't communicating. And as for the 425 rumor, I've been collecting and working on Oldsmobiles for well over 40 years. In that time I've heard about every BS story that someone "remembered". There was the guy who swore that the letter "X" in the VIN derivative of the non-original motor in a 1969 442 stood for "experimental" (as opposed to the Fairfax, KS assembly plant...).
|
|
|
Post by BR[] on May 15, 2016 19:36:21 GMT -5
................................ BLACK
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 15, 2016 20:04:52 GMT -5
I first read BR[]`s post shortly after it was posted. I read right thru it, understanding what was meant by "destroked" We normally think of stroking an engine to increase or decrease engine rpm`s. If I were to be in a discussion with people I know and told them I was going to destroke an engine by doing nothing more than decreasing bore size, no one would raise an eyebrow !! They`d probably roll there eyes because it`s quite a little work to decrease bore size in an existing engine. Destroking is immediately associated with increasing engine rpm`s, reducing the weight of the rotating mass is immediately associated with increasing rpm`s. By decreasing the piston mass you are in effect destroking. The nice part is, GM decreased the bore size in the 400, thereby destroking a 425 allowing a faster turning engine. It`s all terminology is all Destroke means to reduce the STROKE of the motor, period. Usually this is done to increase RPM potential. Sometimes it is done to fit into a specific racing class. Note that one can destroke a motor and NOT reduce the displacement. The fact that people play fast and loose with terminology doesn't make it correct (see: "numbers matching" for example). Language is the use of common terms to represent ideas. If you choose a different meaning, you aren't communicating. And as for the 425 rumor, I've been collecting and working on Oldsmobiles for well over 40 years. In that time I've heard about every BS story that someone "remembered". There was the guy who swore that the letter "X" in the VIN derivative of the non-original motor in a 1969 442 stood for "experimental" (as opposed to the Fairfax, KS assembly plant...). Not your best work joe, you failed to get my drift. But that`s O.K., your props are pretty cool.
|
|
|
Post by BR[] on May 15, 2016 20:19:43 GMT -5
Just for the record....... I'm not the first to use the term destroked. It's been in articles detailing the 442's for years. I know you've read every article that I have JOE, so why feel the need to comment on this one. These are only three clips from different articles describing it as DESTROKED. Feel free to search them on the internet and let them have it too!
By the 1965 model year, Oldsmobile had the answer, by adding 35 additional horsepower. The General Motors brass were swayed by the success of the Pontiac GTO, so they relented on their decision to keep big blocks out of the mid-size cars. The 65 Cutlass 442 could now be equipped with a de-stroked version of Oldsmobile's monster Stage II 425 Rocket V8. Apparently modified to keep within the revised GM bounds restricting mid-size cars to engines of 400 cubic inches or less, this new 442 powerplant measured out at 400 cubic inches on the nose. Using what Hot Rod magazine described as a "moderate" 10.25:1 compression ratio, the 442's Rocket engine produced a claimed 345 horsepower and an amazing 440 pound-feet of peak torque at 3200 rpm. There's no substitute for cubes.
Designed for heavy-duty use, the engine offered such hot rod parts as forged steel crankshaft and connecting rods, light, stamped steel rocker arms with tubular pushrods, plus 2.0-inch intake and 1.625-inch exhaust valves. All of this good stuff, to use the words of Hot Rod, "contributed to vigorous and long-lasting health." In 1965, Oldsmobile continued the 442 option on the Cutlass and the F-85. In this model year, the 442 designation changed definitions. It was now a 400 cubic inch engine. a 4 barrel carburetor with dual exhausts Oldsmobile used the 425 cubic inch power plant from their full size automobile platform. Oldsmobile destroked this engine from 425 cubic inches down to 400 cubic inches for the 442 option. This was done because the General Motors management stated in a memo, that any intermediate automotive platform vehicle could not exceed 400 cubic inches.
Also for 1965, GM raised the displacement ceiling on intermediates to 400 cubic inches. Olds destroked and debored its new 425-cid big-car V-8 to create a hot 400-cid V-8 exclusively for the 1965 Oldsmobile Cutlass 4-4-2. With this change, the name now meant 400 cubes, four-barrel carburetor, and dual exhausts.
The 1965 Oldsmobile Cutlass 4-4-2's horsepower increased by 35, to 345, and torque expanded by 85 lb-ft, to 440. Peak power now came at 4800 rpm, not 5200, and peak torque was on tap at just 3200 rpm, 400 rpm lower than before.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 15, 2016 21:41:18 GMT -5
I`m betting joe has Google bookmarked
Terminology, cause and effect. Common sense
RIP OLDS The ol` geezer you talked with is at least as old as I am, very few people will agree with him. But I do !! I know articles and interviews have been compiled to de-bunk the 425 use. From what I remember there were "loaners" with 425`s to the Lansing (?) Police. Did I dream this factoid? Wasn`t there a 65 or 66 GTO mysteriously fit with a 421 from the factory? A narrow mind is a lonesome place
|
|
|
Post by bubbasz1 on May 16, 2016 5:45:25 GMT -5
A narrow mind is a lonesome place Absolutely!
|
|
|
Post by joepadavano on May 16, 2016 10:22:44 GMT -5
Just for the record....... I'm not the first to use the term destroked. It's been in articles detailing the 442's for years. I know you've read every article that I have JOE, so why feel the need to comment on this one. These are only three clips from different articles describing it as DESTROKED. Feel free to search them on the internet and let them have it too! A lie told twice is corroborated. Magazine reporters and ad copy writers get stuff wrong all the time and then copy off each other (since that's much easier than creating content from scratch). Witness my recently published letter to MCR pointing out the error in one of their Oldsmobile articles, where they admitted their mistake. Just so I'm clear, by your definition, reducing the displacement of an engine by reducing the stroke is "destroking" it. Reducing the displacement by keeping the stroke the same and instead reducing the bore is ALSO "destroking" it. And for the record, the stroke in the B-block and E-block 400 motors is 3.980". Stroke in the 425 is the same 3.980". I'm still struggling with how that is DE-stroked.
|
|
|
Post by oldolds88 on May 16, 2016 10:29:41 GMT -5
de stroke in de motor is de same
|
|
|
Post by joepadavano on May 16, 2016 10:35:09 GMT -5
de stroke in de motor is de same Just to point out how ridiculous it is to misuse words for your own purposes, the fact that Mercedes calls this a COUPE doesn't make it a two door:
|
|
|
Post by shane on May 16, 2016 14:41:27 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by guinness56 on May 16, 2016 18:57:00 GMT -5
Saving that one for later use.
|
|
|
Post by joepadavano on May 17, 2016 8:30:18 GMT -5
My, what a mature and informative post...
|
|