|
|
Post by RAM Z on Sept 18, 2010 18:13:27 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by 1965f85 on Sept 18, 2010 21:44:11 GMT -5
Big Mike.... I actually know of an 65 442 with 6,700 original miles that just sold.... I even have the Pics.
|
|
|
|
Post by RAM Z on Sept 18, 2010 22:09:32 GMT -5
Well where are they Ted?  |
|
|
|
Post by 1965f85 on Sept 18, 2010 22:32:51 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by RAM Z on Sept 18, 2010 22:56:38 GMT -5
If you resized them for your site Ted Id like to see the big pics. Whats the story on this one? Found up here somewhere?
|
|
|
|
Post by BR[] on Sept 19, 2010 10:25:01 GMT -5
Z those undented granny caps don't look right on there. bang em up a little or I can send you 2 shitty ones.
|
|
|
|
Post by 1965f85 on Sept 19, 2010 12:25:39 GMT -5
Jasen,
Quite a story on that one, bro's in the loop on it as well.... The car was located near Port Huron and iitially was tauted as an L69 Tri-power, which proved out to be, not true. The mileage is correct and the car was apparently a dedicated Drag Car until parked, sometime in 1971.... Quite a Discovery!
|
|
|
|
Post by Big Mike on Sept 20, 2010 8:12:02 GMT -5
Big Mike.... I actually know of an 65 442 with 6,700 original miles that just sold.... I even have the Pics. Holy crap! That thing is unbelievable!  It still has the paint on the frame for god-shakes. It looks like they planned for the long storage by putting plastic on the carpet on the door panels. But the little critters still go to it, but man hat thing will clean up great. Can you imagine what that paint would like after a wash and wax? The paint is incredibly shiny as is covered in years of dust. That Pontiac looks cool as well. Where was this gem? Ok I see after I posted my response the city. How totally cool that is. |
|
|
|
Post by 65holiday on Oct 27, 2010 20:55:37 GMT -5
What is the broad cast card? Thanks!!
|
|
|
|
Post by rickman on Oct 28, 2010 9:18:59 GMT -5
Just did a search on M-22's, as we're trying to find one for a chevelle w/ closer production date.
According to what I found, '65 M-22's had a unique casting #3885010 - ONLY - 1st year built!
M-20 = 2:20 1st gear close ratio
M-21 = 2:54 1st gear wide ratio
M-22 = 2:20 1st gear 'rockcrusher' gears cut tighter - HD use for racing - and a fine whine!!
Hope this'll help!
|
|
|
|
Post by BR[] on Oct 28, 2010 13:49:08 GMT -5
Just did a search on M-22's, as we're trying to find one for a chevelle w/ closer production date. According to what I found, '65 M-22's had a unique casting #3885010 - ONLY - 1st year built! M-20 = 2:20 1st gear close ratio M-21 = 2:54 1st gear wide ratio M-22 = 2:20 1st gear 'rockcrusher' gears cut tighter - HD use for racing - and a fine whine!! Hope this'll help! FYI: The M22 was not a drag racing tranny although when everybody heard the words Heavy Duty they thought it was. |
|
|
|
Post by bubbasz1 on Oct 28, 2010 14:30:24 GMT -5
Just did a search on M-22's, as we're trying to find one for a chevelle w/ closer production date. According to what I found, '65 M-22's had a unique casting #3885010 - ONLY - 1st year built! M-20 = 2:20 1st gear close ratio M-21 = 2:54 1st gear wide ratio M-22 = 2:20 1st gear 'rockcrusher' gears cut tighter - HD use for racing - and a fine whine!! Hope this'll help! FYI: The M22 was not a drag racing tranny although when everybody heard the words Heavy Duty they thought it was. Bro actually has it right, purely a road race trans, defiantly not for getting off the line. |
|
|
|
Post by stan65cutlass on Oct 28, 2010 20:40:31 GMT -5
its got the same gears as an m20 but heavy duty. the m21 has drag race gears, i never could figure out why?
|
|
|
|
Post by BR[] on Oct 28, 2010 20:59:32 GMT -5
The high nickle 20 degree helix gears in the M22 are strong, but are not optimal for speed shifting. The M21 has the 45 degree helix gears, which are. Both have the same dead 2:20 first gear. The primary reason for the M22 degree helix is to generate less heat for road racing. So run out and pay $2000.00 plus for an urban legend that simply makes more noise.
|
|
|
|
Post by stan65cutlass on Oct 28, 2010 21:56:12 GMT -5
ill stick with my m20 and promise not to road race. honest. ;D
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 2, 2010 16:28:28 GMT -5
the m-22's are stronger than the m-21's... the weakest link is actually the case ears the secondary shaft.
the quickest way to tell the difference between the m20-wide ratio m-21 close ratio and m-22 close ratio straight cut gears is the input shaft. the early m-20's like 63-64 have no grooves on the input shaft(they are rare), but the 65 and later ones have 2 grooves machined in the splines, the m-21 has one groove, and the m-22 has none. some newer m-22's also had 26 spline input shafts which are stronger than the normal 10 spline.
|
|
|
|
Post by RAM Z on Nov 6, 2010 16:38:51 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 7, 2010 13:22:48 GMT -5
COOL PIE CRUSTS-----Have you tried 'em yet? Tubes or tubeless?
|
|
|
|
Post by RAM Z on Nov 7, 2010 13:58:37 GMT -5
Tubeless radials. Havent tried them out yet.
|
|
|
|
Post by bubbasz1 on Nov 7, 2010 16:10:33 GMT -5
Lay some dish soap in front of the house and heat them bitch's up. Have the wife running the video recorder!!!
|
|
![BR[] Avatar](http://aliquippaoutlaws.homestead.com/Bro442_ANIM_150.gif)
